Comments on: Nike Zoom Lebron Ambassador

By: billy thea beast

billy thea beast — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:00:40 +0000

the reson these shoes r so plain is cuz there r cheap lebrons only 85.00. i like them i might cop em’

By: D' RAGING ANT

D' RAGING ANT — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:23:33 +0000

A combination Beauty & Versatility! NOt like the past Lebron’s shoes that look like feet of cyborgs and robots..

By: Big L

Big L — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 10:46:19 +0000

They look like NIKE NDESTUKTS DRC from 1995…I know y’all remember those trash. These http://flickr.com/photos/eisdealer/271273547/

By: greenmaker24

greenmaker24 — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:57:06 +0000

ugly

By: nick.engvall@nicekicks.com

nick.engvall@nicekicks.com — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:18:56 +0000

I can’t get into any Lebron’s, they all feel the same to me.

By: sneakerfittedguy

sneakerfittedguy — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:53:58 +0000

Dang, I’d cop if they were priced right. They are plain, but that’s the beauty of LeBron’s (at least the good ones). I wasn’t really feeling the 4’s, which were the most complex design from the Nike label. It doesn’t matter how they look, but how they function on the court. These look bad, but comfortable to ball in (ex. Kobe III). They’re ball shoes and not meant to make any fashion statements. All of the LeBron’s are starting to have similar looks though, and I’m not feeling the big heel-tab either (my foot got scraped on a couple, still :S ). If this is supposed to be an Asian release, then that explains the bootleg look to them, LOL! But yeah, these aren’t even part of the official line-up (meaning no number to them), so they don’t even really matter.

By: marcus the great

marcus the great — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:42:08 +0000

i just expect more from the $90 million Nike man