Airwalk Prototype 600 Retro
Posted by Nick Engvall | Mar 2, 2009 Skateboarders will be stoked to know that the Airwalk Prototype 600 Retro is officially making a comeback. If you’re old enough to remember when these kicks originally dropped than even the fact that Airwalk is now found in Payless Shoe Stores, won’t stop you from considering coppin’ a pair of these.
The Airwalk Prototype 600 Retro comes in two classic colorways. The plastic accent pieces on these kicks helped many parents back in the day by providing a more durable material then other kicks. These Airwalks were groundbreaking for their time, and one of the only shoes kids wanted to skate in back then. Now you can relive your childhood by picking up these iconic skate shoes now at HUF. |

Airwalk Prototype 600 at HUF


Oct 4, 2009 at 2:21 pm
Hello , where i can buy it? black withe and red
Sep 24, 2009 at 12:17 pm
I`m looking for a pair of the Airwalk Prototype 600 in a mens US 9, and I`m looking for the Prototype Nova (White and Blue) in a mens US 9 too ! Where I can buy or find them ?
Mar 3, 2009 at 3:20 am
I remember these from back in the day. I think it was late 80’s
Mar 3, 2009 at 2:08 am
haha id cop just to remember back in the day those black and greens … I CAN DIGG IT can you if not grab a shovel get wit da program i had a couple of airwalks back in the day i used to play the mess outta my shoes back then yo
Mar 2, 2009 at 8:06 pm
I’ll be sick when I buy these and then I see that Payless has them. You know what? F*** it!!! I’m coppin’ these!!
Mar 2, 2009 at 5:08 pm
they both look aiight
Mar 2, 2009 at 4:34 pm
they aight, like to see more colorways.
Mar 2, 2009 at 3:14 pm
dem black and green joints kinda sick hope payless dont get em
Mar 2, 2009 at 3:08 pm
I never heard of airwalk…My grandpa would prolly like these
Mar 2, 2009 at 2:59 pm
Said it before, I’ll say it again the Black & Green ones are not that bad.
Mar 2, 2009 at 1:52 pm
Hell yeah, I need those black & funny greens. Hopefully, the Jim shoe will make a comeback too
Mar 2, 2009 at 1:34 pm
not horrible
Mar 2, 2009 at 12:39 pm
first? these are alright