Converse Jack Purcell Perforated Patent Leather Pack
Posted by George Kiel III | Mar 10, 2009 Last month, we showed you two exclusive colorways of the Converse Jack Purcell model, and those who commented thought they were fresh; however, we have now found two more new colorways that are arguably better.
One colorway of the Converse Jack Purcell features a predominately shiny, black patent leather upper with minimal white accents on the toe box, inner lining, shoelaces and eyelets. The other colorway contains a mostly white patent leather upper with a black strip on the toe box. Both pair also possess a plethora of perforations on the upper. Click here to view detailed photos. Via Dunk. |
Converse Jack Purcell Perforated Patent Leather Pack
Converse Jack Purcell Perforated Patent Leather Pack
Converse Jack Purcell Perforated Patent Leather Pack
Converse Jack Purcell Perforated Patent Leather Pack
Converse Jack Purcell Perforated Patent Leather Pack
Converse Jack Purcell Perforated Patent Leather Pack
Converse Jack Purcell Perforated Patent Leather Pack
Converse Jack Purcell Perforated Patent Leather Pack
Converse Jack Purcell Perforated Patent Leather Pack
Converse Jack Purcell Perforated Patent Leather Pack
Converse Jack Purcell Perforated Patent Leather Pack
Converse Jack Purcell Perforated Patent Leather Pack
Converse Jack Purcell Perforated Patent Leather Pack
Converse Jack Purcell Perforated Patent Leather Pack
Mar 16, 2009 at 6:08 pm
not feeling either of them
Mar 12, 2009 at 3:55 pm
i’d take these non-patent leather’d, thanks
Mar 11, 2009 at 8:08 am
THESE ARE DOPE, BUT THE PATENT LEATHER MAKES THEM WHACK
Mar 11, 2009 at 7:09 am
dem black ones allright… still wouldn’t wear dem dough.
Mar 10, 2009 at 11:00 pm
Nice detailed pics.
I like the white
Mar 10, 2009 at 10:47 pm
Black = Yes
White = No
Patent is cool to me on a shoe
Mar 10, 2009 at 9:59 pm
luda06 why are u always bashing nas. nas is one of the best rappers alive and back in his illmatic days he was probably better than anyone you are listening to
anyways these are a nice clean shoe to wear in the spring
but they do need to give patent leather a rest
Mar 10, 2009 at 3:31 pm
I was just making the comparison because both are classic shoes, so patent leather is a problem on both or neither by that definition.
Yeah I agree with you, patent leather is over used, but a solid black patent upper is a look to me that is always nice.
Mar 10, 2009 at 3:25 pm
Come on ‘Kost, these arent AF1’s…but I appreciate your attentiveness to my previous posts.
Yes (um, in my opinion…) I think that patent leather is over-used sometimes…and this is coming from a sneakerhead who LOVES the AJ XI. I just think its lack of creavtivity to just throw patent leather on everything…shiz looks like Catwoman’s shoes.
Mar 10, 2009 at 2:42 pm
Wack (Like Nas’ music).
Mar 10, 2009 at 2:28 pm
Adding patent leather is not ****ing with a classic. Well at least not in my opinion. Biggins, do you complain everytime patent leather shows up on an af1?
I don’t like patent leather being used for more than accents, unless it is black. Then I like it. Those black patent purcells are very nice.
Mar 10, 2009 at 2:25 pm
Holy crap these Jack Purcells DO NOT NEED PATENT LEATHER. This is one classic that shouldnt be F@#%!% with
Mar 10, 2009 at 2:09 pm
And I like Jack Purcells, but I don’t feel the patent leather.
Mar 10, 2009 at 2:08 pm
I’m sorry, but I have to say… FIRST