Nike RT1 Wheat
Posted by Alex Kroviak | Nov 11, 2009 The “Poor Man’s Yeezy” is getting even more blue-collar for this upcoming Holiday season. Dressed like a work boot, these Nike RT1’s are just as fit for the a construction site as they are for the street.
The uppers on these are almost completely suede in a wheat color. Small bits of mesh in the same color are used throughout, as well. Dark brown leather is the choice material to complete the look on the ankle area. A wheat leather Swoosh appears on the upper, providing “ghost” branding along the side. Red laces match part of the outsole and finish off the colorway. How do these compare to the other colorways we’ve seen of the RT1s, like the Black-on-Black colorway we saw last? |

Nike RT1 Wheat


Nov 13, 2009 at 2:46 am
The red laces set em off! Ima cop these asap! Retail can’t b more than 80$
Nov 13, 2009 at 12:29 am
Well then you should copp the RT1wheat, since it represents how you earn income. You’ll just be a construction dude 24/7. I would, they FRESH, for rocking, not wearing to work.
Nov 12, 2009 at 4:55 pm
@Cyclone - Because your feet hurt when you wear boots everyday. I do wear the Timbs when I need to but I have to switch up sometimes. That said, the more I see these I’m not so sure they’re the ones for the job…
Nov 12, 2009 at 4:03 pm
*@ ramatut4001* Why would you buy these to actually work/wear at a construction site??? Im sure boots are required for a reason. Just a thought! I think its real LAME, that you tryin to stunt, on a construction site, wear the Tims homie.
Nov 12, 2009 at 8:29 am
these are decent for an RT1
Nov 11, 2009 at 10:58 pm
these are ok
Nov 11, 2009 at 10:30 pm
these are nice!
Nov 11, 2009 at 9:32 pm
I work on a lot of construction sites where boots are required. I’ll add these to my collection of comfortable sneakers that no one will notice on a job site!
Nov 11, 2009 at 9:26 pm
Nike Timbs (lol)
Nov 11, 2009 at 9:08 pm
i used to hate this shoe…
.
.
.
.
… now i REALLY hate this shoe
Nov 11, 2009 at 8:16 pm
Get rid of the red laces, and they might look nice.
Nov 11, 2009 at 8:01 pm
eww
Nov 11, 2009 at 8:00 pm
AHHH! Ugly!